Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Thompson (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. MuZemike 23:22, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Andrew Thompson (musician)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

no real notability shown. releases and airplay not good enough for wp:music, lacks independent reliable sources (Full Effect Magazine is dead and there is no evidence it is reliable). restored prod deletion. Duffbeerforme (talk) 17:15, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep satisfies WP:MusicStevezimmy (talk) 02:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * How? lacks coverage in multiple non-trivial published works, no charting, no gold or better, no coverage of touring, no albums on major label or one of the more important indie labels, not part of two or more independently notable ensembles, not a prominent representative, no major awards or major music competition, hasn't performed music for a work of media that is notable, no national rotation, not the subject of a national broadcast. Duffbeerforme (talk) 07:09, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Duffbeerforme (talk) 17:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:51, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no evidence of notability from WP:RS. -- Kinu t /c  01:50, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, fails WP:MUSIC. Abductive  (reasoning) 07:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.