Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Trischitta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Consensus here is that this young actor's coverage pushes at WP:GNG, his awards and nominations meet ANYBIO, and his body of work meets WP:ACTOR. My suggestion here is that the article be further improved to serve the project.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Andrew Trischitta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable minor actor lacking Ghtis and GNEWS of substance. Article references resemble PR blurbs, line mentions, or are unrelated to actor. Individual has won and been nominated for a minor award, but not sure if it is substantial enough for recognition. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. red dog six (talk) 14:55, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - Slight lean towards keep. Combine these  with the sources in the article and that award he won and it may push Trischitta past the GNG bar.LM2000 (talk) 19:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  02:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  06:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Won an award, has over a hundred episodes as credit and with sources may meet GNG. Erring on the side of caution in this case for the bar. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:06, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - As per LM2000's findings, meets GNG. 86.153.72.187 (talk) 21:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.