Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Zornoza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 03:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Andrew Zornoza

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails to assert importance or notability. No major works, awards or coverage cited in article. Fails to meet the requirements for WP:Notability Ozgod 14:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Borderline speedy, as it makes no real assertion to notability.    In fact the only thing that might be interpreted as notable is associate editor bit, but it's to a redlinked online publisher that likely would fail notability, itself.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 14:44, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom and  Ark yan .  Plm  209 ( talk to me •  contribs ) 14:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable, per nom.  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 15:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability, no meeting WP:BIO (first point &mdash; primary criterion). The Sunshine Man 15:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, non notable. Tempshill 18:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 20:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.