Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew and Steven Cavarno


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Party of Five. Consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines, but a redirect to Party of Five is appropriate. Davewild (talk) 19:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Andrew and Steven Cavarno

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

this page was made in 2004 and only has one sentence. the page has not been taken care of properly. there is no bio for them and when I looked them up it only shows their role on Party of Five they haven't done anything since 1999 Redsky89 (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, child actors who had a few TV roles as young children (only one was a recurring role, in which they presumably alternated per usual Hollywood practice) and have done nothing since per IMDB. Could possibly have been speedied under A7. --MelanieN (talk) 14:58, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Party of Five. They certainly exist, but I don't see any in-depth coverage that would evidence notability under WP:GNG.  No harm in letting people find out about their only plausibly significant (notable would be too strong a word) role.  --j⚛e deckertalk 15:48, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Party of Five - the target article does mention them. I see nothing of sufficient notability for a standalone article. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.