Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrez Bergen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is a narrow consensus that sources support the notability of this subject. bd2412 T 03:56, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Andrez Bergen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person seems to fail WP:MUSIC as well as WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG as almost all sources I've been able to find appear to be either self-published or an interview with the subject - certainly not " significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" Toddst1 (talk) 21:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Toddst1 (talk) 21:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Toddst1 (talk) 21:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment: I've already pointed out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music that this is effectively a third nomination of this article, and that the previous nominations reached no consensus. I'm not saying that this is a good argument for keeping the article, just that interested editors should probably consider the two previous nominations when making their decision. Richard3120 (talk) 21:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. His album Pop Tart was reviewed in at least four music magazines including Rolling Stone. His album Action Hero was reviewed in two mainstream newspapers. That's enough coverage for music#1. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:07, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: Album reviews are not in-depth coverage of the artist, but coverage of the recording. Album reviews don't satisfy WP:BAND #1 because they are about the album, not the artist.  Toddst1 (talk) 15:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Hmm, WP:NMUSIC - "The published works must be someone else writing about the musician, ensemble, composer, or lyricist, or their works." Bolding added. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:MUSICBIO per duffbeerforme. Also passes WP:AUTHOR, for reviews: 1, 2, and 3.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Just to point out something for those making their arguments based on the quality of publications with reviews: note that the Rolling Stone review cited is not from the well-known, celebrated magazine/web site owned (at the time) by Jann Wenner, but rather by an independent franchisee in another country that licenses the title "Rolling Stone" to publish content of local interests. That said, while the quality/notability of the specific franchisee vary widely from country to country, the Australian version--which is where this one appeared in issue #55--is one of the more significant editions. ShelbyMarion (talk) 16:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough significant coverage in reliable secondary sources for WP:GNG, WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO - Epinoia (talk) 20:56, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the multiple reliable sources identified by Duffbeerfor as WP:NMUSIC defines coverage of a musicians works as significant coverage, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.