Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andries Coetzee (linguist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Joyous! | Talk 00:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Andries Coetzee (linguist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject does not meet WP:NACADEMIC criteria Domdeparis (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:TOOSOON. Tenured, but not a full professor; only earned a doctorate 12 years ago. Bearian (talk) 00:01, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as nothing here for WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF. SwisterTwister   talk  05:10, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep . GS h-index of 17 just passe WP:Prof in low cited field. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   13:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. The case for WP:PROF is there, but marginal. I'm more convinced by the society fellowship (#C3) and journal editorship (#C8). —David Eppstein (talk) 00:38, 3 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.