Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrinox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Andrinox
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Unpublished role playing game. Products that are not yet released to the market are not usually listed on WP. This has no Google or Yahoo search hits, so is presumably not available to the public even in its current state. Once published, would be a valid subject for an article, but not until then. eaolson 13:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Update. In the interest of full disclosure, the article has been updated with a link to a fairly skeleton set of rules. While I guess this makes the article verifiable, I still maintain that it is sufficiently non-notable for an article. eaolson 15:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. It doesn't really affect this nomination.  The article specifically states this is an RPG that was turned down by Wizards of the Coast.  It isn't going to be published any time soon, and its current incarnation is a game in development played through a web forum. -- Whpq 16:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Crystal Ball. As nom suggested, this can be re-created once actually published. Scorpiondollprincess 13:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "Andrinox is in the process of being excepted". It hasn't actually been expected yet. This is like a double crystal ball. --Porqin 13:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Maybe the author means "accepted"? Either way, admitting that notability's not there yet. Delete. Fan-1967 15:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom -- Whpq 13:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per crystal ball mboverload @ 20:24, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.