Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andriux's fun house


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:54, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Andriux's fun house

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't see any coverage in reliable sources to establish that this topic meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for inclusion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is not established. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:39, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete It's just some guy's game server. I somehow doubt that The New York Times has written an article on this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as basically a WP:PROMO piece for a non-notable game-centered community. I don't see any WP:GNG-worthy sources. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 14:06, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:WEB, I was unable to find the New York Times mention either. SarahStierch (talk) 03:28, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Concur with NinjaRobotPirate's assessment. Finnegas (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.