Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andriy Nikolaychuk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 01:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Andriy Nikolaychuk

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article are OBITs with all the normal problems. BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth.  // Timothy :: talk  01:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military,  and Ukraine.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep there is no reason to delete this article Salfanto (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  01:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting. The reason for deleting this article is stated in the deletion nomination. There has been no rebuttal of these points of policy and simply stating "Keep" is not an effective argument on why they are not accurate. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * What could keep the article from being deleted? Also I got a notification saying that the article had been reviewed Salfanto (talk) 16:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Keep  Salfanto (talk) 17:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC) (you can only cast one "vote" Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC))
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.