Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andro-ethnic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Andro-ethnic

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable proto-logism Wuh  Wuz  Dat  01:37, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete asap. Abductive (talk) 02:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems like a non-notable neologism. Can't find any sources for it. Jafeluv (talk) 05:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NEO. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Badly formed neologism.  The combined roots do not mean the intended meaning, which would be better served by cryptoethnic or holethnic; the actual roots suggest "belonging to men (human males) as an ethnic group", which would be a pleasantly ridiculous notion but for separatist feminism.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  Thryduulf (talk) 20:50, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism without sources, lacking notability. The article is also poorly written - I'm not sure if the author is asserting that this is a term of art in media circles ("it used to describe a movement within the media, particularly with the writers and producers of children's television shows"), or simply as a possible neologism ("This term could be considered.... In reality we are unlikely to find...") to describe this perceived "movement". In either case, I could not find any potential sources. Cnilep (talk) 21:09, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oddly, the single occurrence (outside Wikipedia) of "andro-ethnic" indexed by Google, here, seems to use the word to mean ethnic in the sense of "from an ethnic group" (other than my own). Isn't that opposite to what this page says? Cnilep (talk) 21:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: what Ihcoyc/Smerdis said. —Tamfang (talk) 05:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Smerdis of Tlön and his accurate etymology and despite what I trust is not a very serious danger, of Smerdis remaining on his soapbox and writing an article under the same title. Anarchangel (talk) 05:58, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.