Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andul Dutta Chaudhury Zamindar Bari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:12, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Andul Dutta Chaudhury Zamindar Bari

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

inscrutable ramble essay, unsure of its own topic or focus Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete or Userfy - As far as I can tell the article is about the "Dutta Chaudhury" family, which apparently has some historical significance. Unfortunately, the article, which is written by, cites no reliable sources to back it up but rather links to a family website. No prejudice against recreating or userfying to work on it. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 21:29, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  14:52, 25 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  15:14, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete. Very long essay-type article that is very hard to understand. Because it has language that does mean something and is not just made up of random characters, I don't think that this a case of PN, in which it could be speedy deleted per G1. However, I still strongly feel that articles should be direct and easy to understand. I have added too long to the page, but I don't see any way to improve it at this point. Wiki you now, Wiki you later! (talk) 01:03, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not sure what this article is, it reads like fiction to me. Definitely not suitable as a Wikipedia article so I wonder if it was a serious contribution or just a writing exercise. Liz  Read! Talk! 22:10, 9 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.