Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy (film series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Andy (film series)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to establish notability. Lacks non-trivial support. Non-notable film failing WP:NOTFILM red dogsix (talk) 02:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - This page isn't hurting anyone, is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrol wasp (talk • contribs) 01:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - This is not a criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia. The subject is not notable and therefore is not eligible for inclusion.  red dogsix (talk) 01:58, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * See WP:NOHARM. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:38, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I wish the filmmakers well and I like that they've got the drive to make videos, but unfortunately the series just isn't notable enough for an article at this point in time. The series hasn't received any sort of coverage in independent and reliable sources (reviews, news articles, etc) that would show notability, which is what it'd need to pass NFILM. I hope that one day we can have an article on the budding filmmakers and thespians once they hit the big time, but it's just WP:TOOSOON right now. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:20, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete is kind and supportive, and I try to conduct myself the same way. But sometimes firmness is in order. This is an utterly non-notable film series, and the article should be deleted quickly. As for the comment by, I could write an article about how wonderful my Boston Terrier Dexter is, cuddled up against me in his rainbow colored sweater on a cold night, and that page wouldn't hurt anyone, would it? Well, if I tried that kind of foolishness, it would hurt the credibility of the encyclopedia. There are thousands of places on the internet to chat about non-notable topics. I like Facebook. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and it is not Facebook. Cullen328   Let's discuss it  06:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as mentioned, quite hardly much for even a minimally acceptable article here yet. SwisterTwister   talk  08:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.