Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Barter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 15:55, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Andy Barter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability. PR page for non notable person, created and majorly contributed to by COI/SPA. Very little relevant info shows up in searches. Rayman60 (talk) 13:05, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. A Google search for ("andy barter") turned up lots of hits, but most of them were photo credits with little or no information about Barter himself.  I wasn't able to find any in-depth coverage of him in independent reliable sources.  I checked the items in the "References" section of the WP article under discussion, and didn't find anything better there.  Appears to fail WP:GNG. — Ammodramus (talk) 18:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak delete Barely skims GNG - there are two reasonably good sources: The Independent and the Guardian. However, the latter is essentially a show of his work with little analysis, so only the former provides content about him and his work. Perhaps too soon. LaMona (talk) 16:28, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass the notability guidelines for photographers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.