Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Boyd (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Andy Boyd
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable person. Seems like promotional article. The references are no authoritative sources to proof notability. (BTW, I don't know if this person is the same as the previous AfD from 2005.) P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:29, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:58, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I was unable to find any references to this Andy Boyd specifically in Google news either related to his work with Shell. There are indeed a few Andy Boyds on GNews, but none of them seem to match the Andy Boyd here.  Current references are also insufficient as noted by the nominator. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 13:17, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing in the article to suggest notable. Reads like an autobiography. May be significant that the main work on the article was created by two single-purpose accounts. asnac (talk) 13:25, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. An active career, but has not made the impact needed for GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:53, 15 July 2011 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.