Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Daro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Andy Daro

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails to establish notability. Possible attempt at self-promotion. Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 19:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, Italy, Connecticut, Florida,  and New York.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:24, 21 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - not notable and likely written for money by BheekAam along with other articles. As for the tone, most people would blush if they had a Wikipedia article about them that promotional.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 23:33, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * See also Articles for deletion/J. Luke Bennecke - another article by the same author.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 23:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Also:
 * Articles for deletion/Trance Fury (2nd nomination)
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 03:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: Sources in article fail to prove notability (no sigcov/not independent), and a google search shows nothing that would meet WP:NBIO. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 02:05, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable and Wikipedia is not a CV. Kierzek (talk) 03:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable subject. Very little coverage exists. Upper Deck Guy (talk) 19:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: No coverage found for this individual, does appear PROMO. Gsearch is largely social media or legal filings. Oaktree b (talk) 23:35, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete promotional bio that fails all notability standards. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:41, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete smells like poorly executed WP:UPE to me. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete like do I have a choice? This article is certainly promotional, large parts of the article are unsourced, and very little coverage is included. HarukaAmaranth 春香 19:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Looking like snowball. Promotional and the organization you "started" is not even mentioned in the Compass article -- VViking Talk Edits 14:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:AVALANCHE. &mdash;siro&chi;o 16:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.