Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Doonan (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:36, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Andy Doonan
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The original creator of the article requested this be deleted with the rationale information about artist outdated and no longer accurate/relevant. Artist wishes for it to be removed for privacy reasons, and ordinarily I'd just speedy it as "author request". However as this has previously survived an AfD discussion, in this instance I feel speedy deletion would be potentially controversial. I strongly believe we should delete it; not only does the author of the only substantive content want it deleted, but I've no reason to doubt that the subject also wants it deleted and in the case of marginally-notable figures like this the default should be to defer to the subject's wishes. &#8209; Iridescent 19:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previous AFD, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England.  &#8209; Iridescent 19:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:SIGCOV; coverage is mostly local. If there are major errors, WP:TNT applies.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per WP:TNT. The subject does pass criteria 9 of WP:MUSICBIO and is notable. However, the article requires a lot of work and has had multiple tags for many years. Given the request, I am inclined to delete this version of the article with no prejudice against recreation if someone chooses to develop a better article.4meter4 (talk) 15:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.