Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Elerewe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Andy Elerewe

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about an entrepreneur that fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. The sources are mostly passing mentions of the subject. The position he holds does not confer notability on the subject. Possibly WP:TOOSOON or WP:PROMO. Jamiebuba (talk) 23:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nigeria. Jamiebuba (talk) 23:45, 29 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep.

A person who is the head of the Minifootball Association of Nigeria isn’t notable enough because he’s head of a Nigerian Association? You’re expecting me to put ESPN and Goal.com links for a Nigerian football administrator instead of that from the local media? OR aren’t Nigerians allowed to have stubs?

Why are Nigerian pages such easy targets to pull down? Bob Lord (football chairman) is just a football chairman, so why is his page still standing?

I réalisé that most new Wikipedia editors don’t know what they are doing as regards inclusivity and equity in handling different pages from different background.

This reminds me of the time when someone went through all the pages I created and nominated for deletion all the Nigerian pages but left any page that I created of subjects of European or American descent.

I am a big supporter of sticking to the path of Wikipedia that you are familiar with. They are so many things to do on Wikipedia to help the community, scoring cheap points by pulling down pages of an already vulnerable demographic reeks of weakness and sycophancy. Don’t just meander into facets you aren’t familiar with. And y’all need to do better Amaekuma (talk) 23:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)


 * That other fellow has a chapter in a book about him, this guy sells real estate and runs a mini-football league for little kids? Oaktree b (talk) 00:48, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * You don’t even know what Minifootball is and you feel you’re qualified to come and vote here. Amaekuma (talk) 01:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I've been here in wiki for 20 years and at AfD for a little over a year, I can honestly comment on the quality of the sources used. The subject of the article is irrelevant, we need sourced that discuss the "thing" or it can't be kept. Oaktree b (talk) 20:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete The minifootball position is likely not notable and I can only find sourcing about his nomination. The real estate is probably why it's here, some PROMO. Routine announcements, no features about the individual in RS. Oaktree b (talk) 00:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * In your above question you asked if Mini football league was a league for little kids. AND EXACTLY IS THE PROBLEM WE ARE HAVING ON WIKIPEDIA. CLUELESS PEOPLE TAKING BIG DECISIONS. You don’t even know what the topic is but you feel you’re qualified to know if it’s worthy of notability. Amaekuma (talk) 01:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Also the you say because the other subject has a chapter in a book, he is worthy of a page. The Nigerian in question here is the head of Real Estate Developers Association of Nigeria in the nation Nigeria’s capital. In addition to being a Chairman of the Minifootball ass. and a business man. Y’all need to do better. Amaekuma (talk) 01:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @Amaekuma do not bludge disscussion BLUDGEON and do not attack and shout at other editors just because they don't agree with your opinion.  DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 01:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I made a valid point, and if you can’t tackle the validity of my point, then don’t try to evade it by tackling my approach.
 * According to this article you shouldn’t mark a page for deletion just because you aren’t familiar with the topic.
 * Amaekuma (talk) 01:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You obv didn't read what I send.. Also you don't make valid point by attacking and shouting at someone and also aggressively trying to prove that you are right. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 02:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * A person admitted that he doesn’t know what the meaning of the page’s topic is about, but yet went ahead to vote. And I’m supposed to just overlook that detail?
 * Don’t make this page about you, This is a voting page for a page that I created. Amaekuma (talk) 02:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * By being toxic you just proving my point but anyway this article is not notable and other editors can see that. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 02:54, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, you get more ants with honey than vinegar, but that's beside the point. We're looking at quality of the sources. This individual has none. Oaktree b (talk) 20:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nominator and Oaktree.DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 1:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG, as many of this creators other articles have. Nswix (talk) 02:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment His mother passed away, is about the only sort of non-fluff coverage I can find for this football person. Oaktree b (talk) 23:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete because sources do not establish notability. We should also delete other minifootball admins.  Chamaemelum  (  talk  ) 07:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per the source assessment table. All 17 sources focus primarily on two events, with almost no significant coverage. The person who loves reading (talk) 01:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. No in depth coverage of the subject (WP:SIGCOV). Schminnte (talk • contribs) 22:29, 6 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.