Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Favreau


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 10:27, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Andy Favreau

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No proof of notability: reliable sources would, at best, verify he's an actor of bit parts. That his brother has some fame means nothing. Drmies (talk) 02:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * COMMENT: (Note: I am the author of the article, and thus have a vested interest in its retention. I have no direct or indirect connection to its subject.) Notability SOLELY on the basis of who someone is related to isn’t notability (the examples given in WP:BIO are the minor children of notable entertainers, for instance); that being said, being part of a notable family can bolster the notability of someone otherwise on the margins. For instance, it’s unlikely Roger Clinton Jr. would be considered notable simply from his acting career, but his relationship with Bill Clinton pushed him over the hump, so to speak. I would argue that Andy Favreau, having had lead roles in a single TV series and a TV movie with small acting credits otherwise, would be a marginally notable actor, and being brother to someone who is also notable is a factor in considering his worthiness. Brother Bulldog (talk) 03:17, 16 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam (talk) 02:26, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam (talk) 02:26, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 05:36, 16 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete His acting career is not enough to show notability. The coverage that mentions him while being about his brother is no where near enough to propel him to notability. Roger Clinton would not be notable on his own, but he is notable because he has received significant coverage, not just for his relation to W. J. Clinton per se.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:04, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Clearly fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Lacks multiple significant roles. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 22:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.