Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Nguyen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-27 05:38Z 

Andy Nguyen

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Probably a hoax - can't find any proof on internet to back up claims. Possible autobiography. Prod was already removed, so I brought it here. Rawr 07:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Dacium's search for his honours has also come up empty so real problems for this under WP:V. Capitalistroadster 01:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete? Seems to be hoax. No one called Andy Nguyen is a Member of the Order of Australia (AO) nor an officer of the order of Australia. see www.itsanhonour.gov.au. No one with the last name Nyugen has been granted either in 2006. I still suspect that there is a problem with the name. Could not find any reference to him at the university.--Dacium 08:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sources or references to assert any of the claims in an article about a living person Alf photoman 13:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sources, nothing seems to check out WP:V --Tikiwont 15:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:V -- Whpq 20:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. A Google scholar search for "Andy Nguyen" comes up with plenty of patents by a Sacramento inventor but little or nothing from this supposedly prolific academic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 01:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. The contributor of this article has repeatedly been vandalising University of Sydney (history). John Vandenberg 02:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax - someone as prolific and intelligent as the subject of this article would have a lot more of a Google footprint. Lankiveil 06:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete, hoax - someone as prolific and intelligent as the subject of this article would have a lot more of a Google footprint. Lankiveil 06:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.