Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Poole (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Andy Poole (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article relies on a dead link to prove its subject's notability JayCodec (talk) 12:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Comment It's not about what's in the article, it's about what you find with WP:BEFORE, otherwise it's just a referencing issue rather than notability. At worst, this would be a redirect to Queen's Players rahter than deletion. Boleyn (talk) 11:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:03, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:03, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:03, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete The article on the group he was part of has 0 references, and there is nothing suggesing that Poole passes GNG. It is not even clear that the group he was part of is notable, but nothing about him is.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete One dedicated, secondary source article (from the Wayback Machine (-:). No mentions in any of info links at the top of the pages. Lacks WP:N. Tapered (talk) 06:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. At least on the Canadian side of the equation, I just ran a ProQuest search and found virtually nothing that would bolster his passage of WP:GNG at all — I get hits only in the Kingston Whig-Standard, with no evidence of any coverage beyond the purely local. The National Jazz Award is not an award that gets enough media coverage to be a notability-conferring award in and of itself, fairly or not — so it doesn't confer an automatic notability freebie because National Jazz Award on a person who can't be otherwise sourced over GNG. Accordingly, I'm willing to reconsider this if somebody can actually bolster his sourceability on the New Zealand end of things by showing media coverage I can't access — but nothing here exempts him from having to be the subject of more media coverage about him than I've been able to locate. Bearcat (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   18:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.