Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Tomlinson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  04:28, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Andy Tomlinson

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable practitioner at a psychological fringe theory, and a page that looks it was written somewhere between a press release and a book promotion tour. Results from google news and books turn up either books he has authored or brief mentions only, , , the most extensive mention in a book is just that - a mention. Though the actual page has a large number of citations, they are to his own books (6/14 citations), a link to a UK find a therapist page, a link to the agency he is director of, articles he has written, and various other trivial or non-independent mentions that do not pass WP:PROF or the general notability standard. There is no independent coverage in reliable sources to indicate notability. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 14:15, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability (not to mention the obvious POV issues in the article.)JoelWhy (talk) 18:41, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.