Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aneta Kowalska (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Aneta Kowalska
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NSKATE; medal placement at the junior level or bronze/silver medals at the national championships do not meet the requirements of WP:NSKATE. Google search turns up nothing outside of wikis and scoring databases. Previous AFD received zero arguments in favor of keeping this article that cited any evidence of notability. Bgsu98  (Talk)  15:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Skating,  and Poland.  Bgsu98   (Talk)  15:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: Some limited coverage here, here, and here, which I think is evidence of further offline coverage. JTtheOG (talk) 22:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to agree with this – that's an awful lot of coverage and perhaps we should be looking to the GNG rather than the NSKATE SNG. Toadspike   [Talk]  22:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist for further input. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete – The third source provided by JTtheOG seem to contain somewhat in-depth coverage, but multiple good sources are required to pass WP:GNG instead of just one. I'm leaning towards delete as a result. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ   Clara A. Djalim   ໒꒱˚｡⋆  10:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. A search for sources didn't come up with anything other than databases. Let&#39;srun (talk) 22:22, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.