Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Eyes (porn star)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 12:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Angel Eyes (porn star)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

NN name. Performer doesn't seem to meet either WP:BIO or WP:PORNBIO. Dismas|(talk) 04:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete no assertion of notablity made, and does not appear, per nom to satisfy the bio and porn guidlines Benon 05:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. Chris 05:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per no evidence of notability. Edison 06:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 12:01, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This article has nothing in it that asserts the notability of the subject, and nothing of note that would satisfy Wikipedia's policy on articles relating to pornographic actors. Of course, if it later transpires that something happens that does make the subject notable enough for encyclopedic inclusion, then people can always ask for a deletion review. --sunstar nettalk 12:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom--TeckWizTalk Contribs@ 00:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.