Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Quintana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Ángel Custodio Quintana. J04n(talk page) 12:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Angel Quintana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hopelessly promotional and borderline notable at best. Would need total rewriting & there isn't enough fundamentally there to be worth it.  DGG ( talk ) 03:06, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment This shouldn't be outright deleted -- there is a Ángel Custodio Quintana that this used to be redirected to. The redirect should be restored if this is deleted. At first glance, I'd say the sourcing looks very thin, but I haven't had time to look thoroughly. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  04:27, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  04:27, 6 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article is self-promotion. More importantly, no media notability, except for self promotion and some appearances at local conferences (of the pay-for-play variety?).Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 15:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Article is a creation of blocked sockpuppet Ifotograpy (a sockpuppet of Thesoundkillers).  It makes sense to leave a unaccented version of a name of a minor Chilean public servant who shares a similar name (and restore to the status quo ante) instead of blowing the name reservation away.  Since there was a definite call of sockpuppetry, I think a semi-protect on the redirect would be appropriate. Hasteur (talk) 15:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  05:02, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Ángel Custodio Quintana per Calliopejen and Hasteur. I looked at the press section on her website and there's not much there. If 1 and 2, and page 132 of this PDF of a magazine represent the coverage out there, then she absolutely fails notability for a Wikipedia page at this point in time. Mabalu (talk) 00:59, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.