Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Sanchez Gas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 00:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Angel Sanchez Gas

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to meet WP:BIO. Stifle (talk) 09:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Week Keep: I'd argue a permanent display at the Museo de Arte Moderno constitutes notability, but weak notability. The source isn't the most reliable in the world either, so I'm going to try and chase up something more established. Ironholds (talk) 11:36, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Unless better sourcing comes along I don't think the work is notable enough, but I could be wrong. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well I can't seem to find anything :S. The problem is 1) he goes by several different names and 2) I don't speak spanish. Ironholds (talk) 02:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and move to Gelsen Gas. Google |%20%22Gelsen%20Gas%22&sa=N&tab=np Books, |%20%22Gelsen%20Gas%22&sa=N&tab=ps Scholar and |+%22Gelsen+Gas%22 News searches show that there are more than enough sources out there to show notability, but in most cases no more than snippets are displayed. Nearly all of the sources call him Gelsen Gas. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep the assertions of non-notability are pretty weak. What's an artist got to do these days? xschm (talk) 17:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Phil Bridger. Many of the references found by the searches he links to are trivial, but some are not. In particular this booklet and this newspaper article seem like enough for WP:BIO, and the museum holding goes a long way towards WP:CREATIVE. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:46, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.