Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel of Grozny: Inside Chechnya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. If you still feel strongly about merging, address it on the article talk page. &mdash; Maggot Syn 10:52, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Angel of Grozny: Inside Chechnya

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not a noteworthy book per WP:NB Livitup (talk) 19:16, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per Google - I just added an interview and a review to the page.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:30, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep SarekOfVulcan's edits to the article prove notability. Bláthnaid  19:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to be a stub about a noteworthy book to me.--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I didn't really think that the reviews accessed through Google met the criteria of WP:NB - "Some of these works should contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary" - but I will defer to consensus. Just remember, the existence of reviews alone does not confirm notability.  Livitup (talk) 20:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into Åsne Seierstad until either one moves beyond a stub.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 03:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment whatever it is, it's not a 'delete'. The sourced reviews mean that it passes WP:BK. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The reviews cited contain plenty of "critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary". Phil Bridger (talk) 07:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.