Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela (character)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – sgeureka t•c 20:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Angela (character)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fictional character. The article contains no reliable sources that show notability. The show the character comes from is barely notable, the character clearly is not. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 20:33, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 20:33, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Keep - the character is clearly notable. It has been featured in almost all episodes of the show, the character has two apps, one which is successful, the other probably is too, they are one of the main characters. The show is extremely successful, it won a contest in 2016, which gave it start of it’s second season. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 20:40, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * CheatCodes4ever is the article creator, and previously removed its speedy deletion nomination. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  01:19, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The show is (just about) notable, but that doesn't mean this character is notable. Please read WP:N. You need to provide multiple, independent, published sources that have in-depth coverage of this character. Note that none of the current sources count towards that, since they are not reliable sources and don't have in-depth coverage of this character. Having an app is not a measure of notability on Wikipedia. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 20:44, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:58, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * delete - clearly not notable. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:25, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - As with so many articles created by this somewhat problematic editor, sources do not seem to establish the subject's notability.  Rob van  vee  21:48, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable in the slightest with laughable primary sourcing (a wiki, YouTube, etc). It's as if the article creator wasn't even trying here. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  21:52, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This user has no understanding of our policies and should be prevented from creating articles until they prove themselves worthy of doing so. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 22:35, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - asides the glaring non notability of the subject of our discussion, in my candid opinion this is not an encyclopedic material. Furthermore what’s with the rude comments above? You lot can make your points without being condescending. Celestina007 (talk) 12:45, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I realize it comes across as such, especially if this is your first interaction with this editor but some of us have been on the extremely frustrating path of dealing with this person and their problematic edits (the creation of multiple poorly sourced, non-notable stubs) for several weeks already. A quick glance at their and my talk pages will give you some idea but I can assure you, this is just the tip of the iceberg. Please forgive some of us for exuding said frustration on this AfD, myself included.  Rob van  vee  05:35, 26 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Not every animated character ever is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:06, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Too many characters in the fictional universe to make this a valid redirect. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 17:54, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete; Redirect to Angela (given name). Has a list of "characters" under actual people. Hyperbolick (talk) 19:07, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Poorly sourced and non-notable. After deletion, this is worth recreating as a redirect to Angela (given name) per Hyperbolick. -- Kinu t/c 19:37, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTINDISCRIMINATE. ——  SN  54129  12:27, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect: There's an article for Talking Angela which has reliable sources. Toughpigs (talk) 19:34, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. A-NEUN   &#10686;TALK&#10686;  20:27, 28 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.