Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Challis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge to Brimstone Press. The article is currently a redirect; interested editors can use the history to merge what content they feel is appropriate. --Haemo 22:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Angela Challis

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Angela Challis is one of seven articles (now listed at AfD) created by a new user. These seven articles seem designed to advance the publisher, Brimstone Press. I have listed them separately so that they may be considered separately. Angela Challis has not received enough coverage in reliable sources that are independent of Angela Challis and Brimstone Press to develop an attributable article on the topic and the article should be deleted. --  Jreferee  (Talk) 01:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of verifiable sources. Capitalistroadster 03:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 03:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 03:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. I created this and the other entries mentioned in the AfD banner. For a full explanation, see my note on Shane Jiraiya Cummings AfD talk page and my talk page. Re: this entry, it's a stub but per my note about WP:N on my talk page, one I think is worth keep so it can be expanded upon. At least one verifiable source is cited in this entry. --Outcast44 15:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as reference given do not provide evidence of notability, particularly her partner's won website. --Gavin Collins 09:44, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I have added appropriate in-text citations and additional references to clarify and support notability. Given several independent, verifiable sources, the track record of award nominations etc, I believe this stub/start article meets WP:N. However, I can see Turlo Lomon's case for merging with Brimstone Press and more substantially fleshing out that entry (as there is some duplication). Outcast44 15:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Brimstone Press, assuming it passes AfD. There does not seem to be enough independent references to support her (specifically her, not the company), but would be a good addition to add to the history of the company. Turlo Lomon 10:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to Brimstone Press for the reasons that Turlo Lomon gives. --Craw-daddy | T | 09:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.