Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Ken


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 12:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Angela Ken

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 06:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 06:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 06:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 06:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete, as per nom, fails GNG. Also, WP:TOOSOON for this 16-y-o actress. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, the actress just started her career, she doesn't have any significant notability, it is also WP:TOOSOON for a new actress, who just stepped into her acting career. Cheers. Tahaaleem  Talk 09:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly not notable per above. Seacactus 13 (talk) 20:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 03:13, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: She's notable beyond her fame on TikTok. I found some reliable sources about her:, , , and ; and her new song: ,  and ; and being part of two shows: . That said, while the article needs to be expanded, it's good enough to pass WP:NSINGER.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 10:00, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Astig - the cited sources seem to establish GNG. Furius (talk) 12:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Per Astig: I want to add some reliable sources from this influencer. AnsrieJames9 (talk) 04:19, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This comment is from the article's creator. –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲  talk  03:15, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Not sure why that's relevant? Furius (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not follows the guidelines, not much notable also.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 07:51, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The article has only one reference, need more improvement.
 * Comment How can it get that improvement if it is deleted? Furius (talk) 08:09, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Deletion is WP:NOTCLEANUP. SBKSPP (talk) 03:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:MUSICBIO with sources presented by Astig. They're non-trivial and reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 03:33, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources meet the criteria of WP:SINGER. There is significant, non-trivial coverage in multiple reliable publications. –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲  talk  19:47, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The said singer-songwriter is less notable, but it is not the time to create an article about her. NewManila2000 (talk) 08:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, per sources cited by Astig. I would like to remind people that a simple Google search before nominating an article for deletion is not that difficult. Moreover, per WP:NOTE, "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article." Therefore, however many references currently exist in the article in question is immaterial to questions of notability. Additionally, per WP: Multiple sources, "based on existing Wikipedia community norms, it seems that challenges to notability are successfully rebuffed when there are three good in-depth references in reliable sources that are independent of each other." I don't think it's that troublesome to go on Google and find 3 articles about the figure in question. In fact, Astig provided 9.Koikefan (talk) 04:26, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.