Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Martin (priest)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Archdeacon of Horsham. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Angela Martin (priest)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of notability found. Despite the recentness and this happening in England, this got no coverage in independent sources. Fram (talk) 14:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 14:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 14:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 14:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:53, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Despite my best efforts, the subject fails WP:GNG. Missvain (talk) 05:32, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. Note that she is an archdeacon, albeit very recently appointed, and we have usually kept articles on archdeacons. I'm undecided as to whether we should, but it's still the case. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * AfD outcomes for archdeacons have been very mixed, not "usually kept". The ones that are notable get kept, the other ones don't. Fram (talk) 11:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * In fact, a number have been kept purely because of their post. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Then these were outliers and not supported by policy. Articles for deletion/Clifford Lacey, Articles for deletion/William Fitsrogo, Articles for deletion/Joseph Verschoyle, Articles for deletion/Wandlyn Snelgrove, Articles for deletion/Tim Raphael. Others have been kept because enough coverage was found. Fram (talk) 16:29, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Archdeacon of Horsham as an ATD and tag with R with possibilities. TartarTorte 20:13, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - I agree. It fails WP:GNG MaskedSinger (talk) 20:18, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I must have looked at this article 24 or 34 times when I reviewing them. There seems to be an attempt to add folk. There seemed to be several of these religuous folk and couldn't make head nor tail of it. I see several have been through Afd already.   scope_creep Talk  09:23, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Archdeacon of Horsham per . I don't see a delete outcome as consistent with our ATD policy if there are not exceptional content issues. &mdash; Charles Stewart (talk) 09:46, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 22:48, 12 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.