Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Myles Beeching


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   withdrawn; all others are now keep. Non-admin closure. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 15:00, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Angela Myles Beeching

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The article in question is just over the CSD line, but I still don't see any reason why this person is particularly notable or significant. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 18:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Updates have been made to the article to highlight person's contributions and breadth of their work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CreativeWikiWriter (talk • contribs) 18:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete while definitely above CSD, this article appears promotional, and after a reasonable search, I do not think that this person meets WP:BIO, especially WP:AUTHOR. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 19:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Changing to Weak keep per below. Seems to have some significance, though meeting WP:Author is still somewhat questionable. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 14:18, 18 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak keep I've wikified and extended the refs, as well as removing material directly on the merits of the forthcoming new edition of her book. Despite that previous content (and the apparent WP:SPA element of the article's creation), her Oxford University Press book going to 2nd edition and content on sites like Polyphonic.org incline me to the view that the article should be kept. AllyD (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per AllyD. There are at least a few reviews of her book such as .  Hobit (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per AllyD, and Hobit seems to have established some kind of notability.Acather96 (talk) 05:45, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.