Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Rawlings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Angela Rawlings

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. None of the sources in the article are independent of the subject, or SIGCOV for that matter, and I was unable to find any SIGCOV during a search. The best that I could find was an interview from 2018 that didn't contain any independent prose from the author, who also states that she has collaborated with the subject in the past. Alvaldi (talk) 14:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, Iceland,  and Canada. Alvaldi (talk) 14:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Language,  and Poetry.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  14:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: sources seem to support established notability, and she has a new area of notability as the nominated candidate for 2024 Icelandic presidential election on behalf of a glacier.  Pam  D  09:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @PamD I might be missing something as I'm not seeing significant and independent sources in the article. Could you please link to what you beleive are the WP:THREE best significant sources about the subject? Note that being a candidate in itself is not enough to pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Alvaldi (talk) 10:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I've added one scholarly paper for a start, 20 pages analysing her major poem. Works based on that same poem have appeared in various festivals. The 2012 Poet-in-Residence post is notability in itself: there will be extensive coverage, possibly in offline sources, in Australian media. Pam  D  12:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * And added a review in The Antigonish Review, not open-access but available online via Wikipedia Library. Pam  D  14:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. I have added some more reviews of the Wide slumber for lepidopterists. Perhaps too many.  But these seem to me to help establish notability (subject of multiple independent reviews). (Msrasnw (talk) 15:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.