Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Travers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge to Minor characters in the Jeeves stories. I will redirect there for now, the histories are preserved if anyone wants to merge extra content. W.marsh 20:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Angela Travers

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Another minor character in P G Wodehouse universe. All there is to be said about many of them is their relationship to Wooster or whichever main character. Snippets of plot synopsis should be in the article about the book, not scattered over the various characters. Delete. Squiddy | (squirt ink?)  13:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

The same reasoning applies to:


 * Delete all Just because one likes a book or series of books is not a good reason to create a spew of articles about each individual character, when the individual characters have not been the subject of multiple independent reliable and verifiable sources, and the articles consist of snips from the books. Edison 15:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,


 * Merge into a single article on Minor characters in Jeeves and Wooster. Walton monarchist89 19:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Jeeves and Wooster. That article's not too long yet.  To quote WP:FICT: "Minor characters (and places, concepts, etc.) in a work of fiction should be merged with short descriptions into a 'List of characters.' This list should reside in the article relating to the work itself, unless it becomes long..." delldot | talk 21:23, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Jeeves and Wooster per delldot's reasoning. Barno 04:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into a single article per Walton monarchist89. Their articles are very short and could stand the merge with each other, without crowding the Jeeves and Wooster article. User:Dimadick
 * Delete all as not demonstrating real world notability. I do agree with the above sentiment that Jeeves and Wooster could use a (concise) plot summary. --maclean 05:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Jeeves and Wooster is not the best place for a merge, as that is specifically about the TV series. ‎Minor characters in the Jeeves stories already mentions them, and plot synopses should be in the articles about the book or story (to avoid the same material being duplicated under each character). Squiddy | (squirt ink?)  14:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.