Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Wendland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Angela Wendland

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questions about general notability, PROD removed by article author. Laber□T 23:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Deletion was proposed by user Piotris today, citing insufficient coverage. To note, the Wikipedia page for Angela Wendland has been patrolled and reviewed for notability without any page issues found prior to this proposal.

The General notability guideline states, "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it need not be the main topic of the source material."

The page for Angela Wendland has 18 references that are from and not limited to magazines, newspapers, websites and company social media platforms. The subject has received considerable mention in a majority of the sources provided. Additionally, more References have been added, including national news source USA Today and other entertainment sources under Additional Ventures further establishing notability of the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitleyheights (talk • contribs) 00:52, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The claims do not add up to being notable, and the sources are a mix of unreliable sources, primary sources and sources that either make no mention of Wendland at all or only mention her in passing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:54, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep In primary sources 5 and 6, Wendland is a main source of topic - pictured and named with video footage. Please specify which sources "make no mention of Wendland at all", because she is pictured, named and/or included in video footage in each of the links provided.  Wendland's occupation is spokesmodeling.  The article was created to outline her role in the industry, an industry that is largely covered only through via video and  photos.  Secondary sources (JStor, etc.) are rare to find, as Wendland is not a veteran in the industry (and even if she was secondary sources are not typical in the brand ambassador world). I request the article be given more time and consideration for further experience to be included as her career continues.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whitleyheights (talk • contribs) 18:09, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best as none of this actually has convincing signs of convincing notability, thus delete because it's still questionable. SwisterTwister   talk  22:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I looked her up in the databases I have access to and didn't find any good RS news sources. I think she's a case of WP:TOOSOON. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.