Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Wright


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 07:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Angela Wright

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

• Non-notable person who ran a company that went broke in 2015 without ever achieving any notice in the press that I can see, other than their filing for liquidation. • Article is entirely unsourced (except for the one ref about liquidation I just added). • Possible WP:COI: one editor has a username similar to the article subject. Mathglot (talk) 07:45, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 *  Notified all non-bot users with more than 1 edit: Rich Farmbrough (creator) (T, c), Tonyinman (T, c),  A wright27 (T, c).   Mathglot (talk) 19:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:ANYBIO winner of major award. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 19:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC).


 * Delete as aside from this apparent award, there's nothing else to suggest a better article with better improvements. SwisterTwister   talk  05:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Rich F.  Quality and notability are two different things.  I agree article quality is weak, but that is not grounds for deletion.  Queen's Award for Enterprise Promotion is a major award, and am noting that the list article has all recipients linked, with about half blue at a rough glance. This is a person of adequate notability and even though the company is now defunct, that is not an issue, many notable people have failed enterprises.   Montanabw (talk)  23:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree with Rich F. Moscowamerican (talk) 04:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Farmbrough has said it all.--DThomsen8 (talk) 15:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * DeleteLittle or nothing to suggest notability, other than questionable 'national' award for 'local' business people which hasn't been demonstrated to confer notability on recipients. Reads more like a Linkedin resume rather than an article. Tonyinman (talk) 21:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.