Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelfood McSpade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) C T J F 8 3  chat 21:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Angelfood McSpade

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I don't think this character is notable on her own. I think a brief mention of her and the surrounding controversy in one of the other Crumb-related articles would suffice. Stonemason89 (talk) 23:49, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep by far enough sources, Sadads (talk) 01:05, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The content is well-sourced and encyclopedic, demonstrating the literary and social significances and controversies regarding the character, and there would be no basis for cutting it down to a "brief mention". I don't see any existing article that would be an appropriate merger target for this content. --Arxiloxos (talk) 01:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment there are a ton of offline sources asserted, more than seem reasonable to my suspicious mind. Can anyone verify that any of these exist and mention this character? Jclemens (talk) 06:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You can do that yourself by following the links to Google Books. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:36, 15 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Controversial character with a substantial coverage. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 19:15, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.