Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelhack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  00:15, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Angelhack

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

very low level of coverage. A big hackathon, but are hackathons individually notable? Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:37, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:58, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 05:59, 24 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete This is an ambitious but very new undertaking (formed in 2011), and up to now it has not received the required significant coverage from independent reliable sources. Everything I found at Google News is minor or from unreliable sources. There is one significant piece cited in the article, from TechCrunch, but that's not enough for WP:CORP. Maybe this will get more notice later, but for now it is WP:TOOSOON for an article here. --MelanieN (talk) 14:36, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, insufficient significant coverage from multiple non-primary reliable sources for the subject to be considered notable as defined by WP:GNG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 11:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.