Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelica Jade Bastién


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Angelica Jade Bastién

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

As mentioned on Wikipedia talk page, there are scores of film critics who are at least as well known as this one who do not have Wikipedia pages. Wikipedia pages for film critics should only exist when it comes to ones like Pauline Kael, Roger Ebert etc.

Also, as Staceyt04 said, "none of the language present connotes any kind of notability. Furthermore, the tone with which this article is written suggests self-promotion. There are references to her current output at Vulture and a Twitter page that, as of this writing, does not exist. 6 of the 23 sources provided are just her writing. The act of writing, as well as the fact of being employed as a staff writer, is not itself notable." — Preceding unsigned comment added by WarrenWilliam (talk • contribs) 22:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women,  and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 19:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2023 November 22.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 19:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. She meets WP:BIO, Just that some more work needs to be done! Micheal Kaluba (talk) 14:29, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. She meets notability as a creative professional given that she has been nominated several times for a significant award (ASME Awards), she is widely cited across significant RS, and she provides commentary in multiple RS. And despite your opinion, notability for critics isn't determined based on your personal determination. Citrivescence (talk) 03:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep I also want to add that the nominator made an edit to this page about a highly controversial topic that was rolled back, which indicates this is not a good faith nomination. Citrivescence (talk) 03:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If Bastién is significant enough to have her own Wikipedia page (and I'm not convinced that she is), then her Wikipedia page should include at least *some* of the opinions she has shared with her readers. WarrenWilliam (talk) 17:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.