Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelo Hyder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Angelo Hyder

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks the coverage required to meet WP:GNG. There is nothing listed under references and the external link (from which most of the article appears to be directly copied) mentions him in relation to getting a fighter a title shot and that appears to fall under WP:ONEEVENT. Mdtemp (talk) 21:39, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 22:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 22:26, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment : Could possible !vote 'Keep' on this one IF the references are improved to show what depth there is to his roster. --Donniediamond (talk) 11:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nominator. The single reference is an aside in an article about a fighter not him.  With regard to trainers they would have to be associated with more than one or two decent boxers to override the WP:NOTINHERITED without good articles directly about them.Peter Rehse (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete insufficient sourcing to establish WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 02:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks the significant independent coverage required for notability. Papaursa (talk) 00:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.