Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelo Sepe (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:55, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Angelo Sepe
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a nomination requested by Vic49 (talk) on my talk page. I previously removed his proposed deletion template, after noticing that there was a previous AfD discussion, here. I do not have a strong opinion one way or the other on deleting or keeping this article, I just didn't think a prod was appropriate. Kevin (talk) 00:15, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: Sepe is not notable. The references for Angelo Sepe, have to do with his involvement in the Lufthansa heist, murders he was involved in following the heist and his murder. The Lufthansa heist article contains this important information about him as a member of the heist team (Lufthansa heist), murders he committed (Lufthansa heist) and his murder. The mentioning of Sepe in that article is sufficient enough; it covers the important information about him. If the article is to be kept a lot of the information needs to be removed; the Family history & lineage, and Personal life section have no inline citations to prove any of this information is real. The other sections need to be rewritten with references. --Vic49 (talk)  20:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:40, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Passes WP:BIO. also noticed he passed his first AFD. Though many years ago it indicates notability.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:24, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Sepe falls into the Notability (people) section, he is only known for the one event of the Lufthansa heist and is incorporate in that article already. --Vic49 (talk)  19:45, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as per WP:PERP, and WP:ONEVENT, it's been over 5 years since the last AfD so long lasting notability can now be determined. LibStar (talk) 01:51, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: - Does not meet standard of notability for Crime victims and perpetrators. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Burkina Faso (talk • contribs) 06:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment. Since this is a procedural nom and the article has survived a previous AFD, a little more discussion would be helpful in determining if consensus really has changed. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * This comment from the original passed AFD says it all in my opinion, Not very many Google hits, but deffinately notable and verifiable. He was a part of the Lufthansa heist (which happened way back in 1978 - likely why so few Google hits). From the article: "About $5 million in cash and $850,000 in jewelry was stolen from the Lufthansa airlines cargo terminal, making it the largest cash robbery in U.S. history. Largest cash robbery in US history, deserving a Wikipedia article. He also passes WP:BIO as I earlier stated. My Keep stands.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * if Sepe did this all individually it would make him notable but he is a member of a team that did it, individual notability is not established. LibStar (talk) 11:55, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I still, stand with Delete. Sepe does not pass WP:Bio Crime, if a crime individual is known for one event he should be incorporated into a lead article which is the  Lufthansa heist; Sepe is already mentioned throughout the Lufthansa heist article. --Vic49 (talk)  14:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:ONEVENT applies, and the matter is more properly covered in Lufthansa heist article. As above, does not pass WP:PERP --Whiteguru (talk) 11:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.