Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelos Tsiaklis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Aitias // discussion  21:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Angelos Tsiaklis

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A7 (bio): Real person; doesn't indicate importance/significance: Does not assert notability under WP:ATHLETE and WP:FOOTYN RM-Taylor (talk) 23:54, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable footballer who fails WP:ATHLETE. GiantSnowman 08:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. "he did not make a first-team appearance" signed it's own death warrant really. Spiderone (talk) 12:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Wrexham are a professional team in a national division so he passes WP:FOOTYN with flying colours. BigDom 16:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * .........except that FOOTYN was shot down in flames by the WP community and is not policy -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:23, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Why is it still there then? Surely if it is not policy it shouldn't have its own page. BigDom 16:27, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * See WP:ESSAY; "n essay is a page reflecting the views of an editor or a group of editors. Unlike policies and guidelines, no formal attempt to gauge their widespread consensus has been made." :) Cheers,  I 'mperator 16:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, has not played in a fully-pro league, thus failing WP:ATHLETE. No significant third-party coverage fails the wider scope of WP:N. --Jimbo[online] 11:42, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, having not played to required level per ATHLETE or achieved anything special besides. Plenty of previous consensus that England Conference does not meet level for individual players without WP:GNG. Appearances in LoI and NZFC among others are certainly more notable than that.-- Club Oranje T 11:23, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Youth player who came nowhere near the first team at Manchester City before being released. He has not thus far demonstrated notability. Oldelpaso (talk) 16:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.