Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angels & Stars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Black Kite (talk) 00:27, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Angels & Stars

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable just released song. debut single. Features notable rappers, but fails WP:NSONG. possible redirect to Eric Turner Gaijin42 (talk) 16:23, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * note to closing admin - This AFD has been deleted multiple times from the page, it may be worth letting it stay open longer as others may have missed it. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * keep - single was released just over a week ago, no need to rush. This should help: Eric Turner ft. Tinie Tempah, Lupe Fiasco: 'Angels & Stars' (Digital Spy); ERIC TURNER F/ LUPE FIASCO & TINIE TEMPAH – ‘ANGELS & STARS’ (Rap-Up) for starters. My crystal ball says that with such highly notable rappers, it will likely be on some chart. Failure to chart should result in this redirecting to the full album when it is released, but as a trio of notable musicians latest release, this article will suffice. - Theornamentalist (talk) 21:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * your WP:CRYSTAL ball is specifically outlined as a reason to NOT keep this article. Every song by every no name band COULD chart. We make pages about the ones that are ALREADY notable. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * It's only because I've seen a lot of articles like this which get deleted, and a week later they are recreated by a different user; sometimes references are lost, proper prose replaced by nonsense. Since this has roughly a week until closing, I will check again for references. With 3 stars of this magnitude on a single track, I suspect it will pass before the AfD closes. - Theornamentalist (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's gradually improving. If you wait a few more days, then it will be a much more notable article, but that does not mean that it should be deleted/redirected. It's already been improved a little and, with reviews about to storm in, it will definitely be improved a lot more. Rhain1999 (talk) 11:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Let's give it another week to see whether it becomes "a much more notable article." Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Along with the above sources (Digital Spy, Rap-Up), I found this, this and this which appear to be reliable sources. While the amount of coverage isn't overwhelming, on the whole, I think there's enough available material to support a stand-alone article.  Gongshow  Talk 06:38, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.