Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angels (2007 film)

 ''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.''

The result was keep and cleanup. (non-admin closure)  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Angels (2007 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * While tidying a tangle of old cut-and-paste moves, and of articles sitting over old deleted or non-deleted articles about other subjects (see Cut and paste move repair holding pen), I found three separated sequences of edits about the film Angels (2007 film), and put them all here. But many of its edits seem to be by Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gerald Gonzalez, and thus by banned users. But the references in this article seem to show that this film exists. Does this article need to be deleted? Old misbehavior by Gerald Gonzalez does not stop readers from wanting information about this film. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:45, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Article looks clean enough, and the film was shown in theaters so this is a default keep as per Notability (films). – H T  D  15:48, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Clean up maybe. I found some refs indicating notability, listed below. Too busy to place them myself though. Note that there was another unrelated Filipino film entitled 'Angels' in 2003, and a Belgian film entitled 'Angel' in 2007. Both make it harder to look for refs.--  Obsidi ♠ n   Soul   16:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)




 * Keep and if it's 100% necessary to remove all edits from the banned user, clean up as well. Don't like the idea of having to delete a notable article because of the editor. Sounds like an ass-backwards policy if it exists.  Agent Vodello OK, Let's Party, Darling! 16:37, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.