Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelus Foundation (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Angelus Foundation
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Created by a single purpose editor. The references are either primary or mostly small one line mentions in mainstream press. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 04:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  05:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and England. LibStar (talk) 04:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  06:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with the nomination. MaskedSinger (talk) 07:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: per the nomination. My search didn't bring up anything useful to show notability. TarnishedPathtalk 13:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.