Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelus Silesius Meeting House


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Borderline G11 Tone 14:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Angelus Silesius Meeting House

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, promo The Banner talk 11:51, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:52, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:52, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:52, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, w umbolo   ^^^  13:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 13:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. While I have a feeling this entry is part-promotional, the organization is briefly? (snippet view) discussed in and . There are also quite a few passing mentions; but sources are in Polish and generally snippet view so it's a pain to analyze them. This pretty much hinges on whether those sources provide in-depth coverage, and without a trip to a library in Poland we cannot be sure. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is indistinguishable from what the organization would use as a web page. Essentially promotional, possibly to the extent of G11 speedy. I accept Piotrus's opinion that it might be slightly notable, but the combination of borderline notability and clear promotionalism is quite enough for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 03:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.