Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelzoom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:09, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Angelzoom

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails notability according to WP:BAND. While the band has released two albums, they have been released on an independent/mail order label. I don't see where they meet any of the criteria established under the applicable notability guideline for bands. Cindamuse (talk) 13:27, 28 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I was unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources, but a selective merge to X-Perience may be in order.--Michig (talk) 13:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete as it does not appear to be notable. The notability is so low, that the artist itself does not have an article but instead is redirected here. Nergaal (talk) 00:45, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no notability demonstrated in any source, and no sources to support the claims. N2e (talk) 15:52, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.