Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angie Paccione


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep AdamBiswanger1 04:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Angie Paccione
Non-notable page about a candidate. See similar discussion at Articles for deletion/Diane Farrell. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WatchingYouLikeAHawk (talk • contribs).

Delete this campaign ad please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.166.49.95 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 5 October 2006
 * Keep. Not just a candidate, but a leader ("Majority Caucus Chair") in the Colorado State House, thus satisfying the second notability category given in WP:BIO, "Political figures holding international, national or statewide/provincewide office or members of a national, state or provincial legislature" (emphasis added). -David Schaich Talk/Cont 21:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep re David Schaich's point. Edward Wakelin 21:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Unlike Diane Farrell, this person actually won an election, being elected to the Colorado House of Representatives in 2002. The Denver Post writes about the political advertising surrounding her, and also writes about her own political advertisments.  The New York Times noted that she garnered endorsement as a result of the events surrounding Terry Schiavo.  And she even gets coverage from the UNC Mirror.  &#9786;  The WP:BIO criteria are satsified.  Keep.  Uncle G 21:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. John Broughton  |  Talk 23:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:NN. Michael 02:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep; though the article needs to be sourced to reliable sources, I have little doubt that the information contained therein is verifiable. The article is relatively NPOV.  I see no reason to refer to notability guidelines to prove that this article should be kept when Wikipedia policy does not indicate that it should be excluded; this is a candidate for a major party for a national office, in any event. &middot;  j e r s y k o   talk  &middot; 18:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, current State Representative.--Tdl1060 17:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.