Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angle (journalism)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Article (publishing). Mz7 (talk) 21:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Angle (journalism)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per "Wikipedia is not a dictionary". Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  03:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Delete or Merge to Article (publishing). Agree with 'not a dictionary', might be a useful element in the Article article. Gab4gab (talk) 17:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge to Article (publishing); should not stand on its own per WP:NAD, but is an important part of writing. MereTechnicality   ⚙  15:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge to Article (publishing) - endorsing the above opinions. No need to be a standalone, particularly in its current form.  Could always be WP:SPLIT if it outgrows its place in the parent article.  Doubt it will anytime soon.  AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 11:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.