Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angle Man


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Wonder Woman enemies. v/r - TP 15:44, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Angle Man‎

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD. No evidence that the fictional character as a stand-alone subject has significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, so he do not not meet the general notability guideline. Without reliable secondary sources that give reception or significance to the fictional character, any article about him can only be a plot-only description of a fictional work and an indiscriminate collection of information, unsuitable for Wikipedia. A quick search engine test does not show anything different to presume that the character deserves a stand-alone article. Jfgslo (talk) 23:01, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jfgslo (talk) 23:03, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Jfgslo (talk) 23:03, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Character is in List of Wonder Woman enemies and could be redirected there.SPNic (talk) 02:01, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - If not kept, redirect/merge to List of minor DC Comics characters is a better course. Perhapse something that should have been proposed prior to PRODing and then AfDing. - J Greb (talk) 15:22, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to List of Wonder Woman enemies. This B-list villain seems unlikely to have coverage significant enough to meet the WP:GNG as anything more than an entry in the list. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:52, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.