Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anglican Church of St Theodore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Buck  ets  ofg 21:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Anglican Church of St Theodore

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

prodded as "non-notable - fails WP:CHURCH. prod replaced by hangon, so here it is. As well as being written as an ad, the article doesn't really suggest that the church is notable, so I agree it should be deleted. JPD (talk) 16:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- JPD (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * DeleteIf no claim to notability is made the article should be deleted. --BozMo talk 21:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:CHURCH; there is no evidence of special notability to merit its own article. Walton monarchist89 17:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I wasn't suggesting it I was considering doing it. "No assertion of notability" is enough to qualify for speedy: if there is ANY assertion of notability it comes here. See WP:CSD.--BozMo talk 11:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as NN local church. -- Bpmullins | Talk 19:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. The confusion about speedy is becasue you do not put hangon in place of "prod". The use of "Our" in the article suggests it may well be a copyright violation, but I doi not know from what. --Bduke 20:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The "our" probably comes from the book about the church cited as a source. A whopping 3 Google hits, all trivial mentions. Fails WP:CONG in a major way. Inkpaduta 22:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Even though I have made a few edits to the article, it fails to prove any notability. Any significant content could be easily be included in Toorak Gardens, South Australia or Anglican Diocese of Adelaide articles. Dan D. Ric 17:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not particularly notable, as far as churches go. Lankiveil 04:07, 11 February 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete not notable.--cj | talk 10:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.